MTN GROUP LIMITED - Update on US Anti-Terrorism Act litigation: Zobay and Long
What this filing means
MTN has lost a procedural round in its long-running US Anti-Terrorism Act litigation. The Eastern District of New York denied the company's requests to reconsider, or take an immediate appeal of, its earlier decision allowing certain claims in Zobay v. MTN Group Limited to proceed. The Zobay case and the related Long case now move to discovery. The court explicitly states the rulings are procedural and do not constitute a finding of wrongdoing or liability, but the claims are now advancing rather than being dismissed.
MTN is being sued in the US over alleged links to attacks in Iraq and Afghanistan. The company tried to get the case thrown out or paused, but a judge has said the case can move forward to the next stage, where both sides share evidence. This is not a ruling that MTN did anything wrong — the judge explicitly says that — but it does mean the legal fight continues and could drag on for a long time.
Bear case
- The court denied MTN's requests to reconsider or certify an immediate appeal, leaving certain ATA claims to proceed.
- Both Zobay and Long cases advance to discovery — the costly information-exchange phase of US litigation.
AI-generated summary by SENS-AI, based on the original JSE SENS filing.
SENS-AI conclusion
A procedural setback, not a liability finding. The court's denial of reconsideration and interlocutory appeal means the Zobay and Long ATA claims will proceed to discovery, extending the litigation timeline and keeping a known overhang in place. The filing is careful to state no finding of wrongdoing has been made, and MTN will now have its first opportunity to challenge the factual allegations. The 20-day pre-announcement move of +10.9% is unrelated to this litigation update — it reflects drift before publication, not positioning for or against this event. The economic impact remains unquantified pending the discovery phase and any summary judgment motions. So what: the litigation overhang persists, but the market still needs a merits determination — or a settlement — before the financial exposure can be sized.
The next material development will be the outcome of discovery and any summary judgment motions, which will determine whether the claims survive to trial.
Evidence from the filing
The court denied MTN's requests to reconsider its decision or permit an immediate appeal, leaving certain ATA claims against MTN to proceed.
“the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York denied MTN's requests to reconsider, or permit an immediate appeal of, its earlier decision allowing certain claims under the US Anti-Terrorism Act in Zobay v. MTN Group Limited to proceed”
The Zobay and Long cases will advance to discovery, when the parties exchange information they possess.
“The Zobay case, together with the related Long v. MTN Group Limited case pending in the same court, will now proceed to the discovery phase”
MTN had no opportunity at the motion-to-dismiss phase to challenge the factual allegations, and the court has made no finding on the matter.
“Under US law and procedures, MTN could not challenge the factual allegations made against the company at the motion-to-dismiss phase and accordingly, there is no finding made on the matter”
More on MTN Group Limited
Related filings
More from MTN
- MTN GROUP LIMITED - DISCLOSURE OF ACQUISITION OF BENEFICIAL INTERESTS IN SECURITIES IN MTN GROUP
- MOBILE TELEPHONE NETWORKS HOLDINGS LIMITED - Interim financial results for the six months ended 30 June 2026
- MTN GROUP LIMITED - Launch of share repurchase programme
- MTN GROUP LIMITED - Interim financial results for the six months ended 30 June 2026
- MTN GROUP LIMITED - MTN Rwanda results released for the six-month period ended 30 June 2026